FAQ
Cover
This is the archive Discourse for the Processing (ALPHA) software.
Please visit the new Processing forum for current information.

   Processing 1.0 _ALPHA_
   Topics & Contributions
   Simulation, Artificial Life
(Moderator: REAS)
   Similarity
« Previous topic | Next topic »

Pages: 1 
   Author  Topic: Similarity  (Read 883 times)
Dara

WWW Email
Similarity
« on: Apr 29th, 2003, 9:49am »

similar objects are grouped together in time + 6 sliders.
 
www.darakilicoglu.com/wod/p5/same
 
 
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2003, 9:50am by Dara »  
REAS


WWW
Re: Similarity
« Reply #1 on: Apr 29th, 2003, 9:59pm »

this is a great example. i think it's very ironic that the totally uninteresting part of the code (scrollbar) is about as long as the interesting part of the code (asset). how do you plan to extend it?
 
pollux

WWW Email
Re: Similarity
« Reply #2 on: Apr 29th, 2003, 11:36pm »

on Apr 29th, 2003, 9:59pm, REAS wrote:
i think it's very ironic that the totally uninteresting part of the code (scrollbar) is about as long as the interesting part of the code (asset). how do you plan to extend it

 
i think it's very interesting that it takes the same amount of code for them to interact among themselves as for us to interact with them...
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2003, 11:41pm by pollux »  

pollux | www.frwrd.net
Dara

WWW Email
Re: Similarity
« Reply #3 on: Apr 30th, 2003, 2:22pm »

Casey,
 
I am glad you liked it. But I am not sure what else i can do with current structure. I want to built something else which creates magnetic fields from asset densities of areas. So rather than assets following closest asset they would move to high density areas. Boring?    
 
Thank you very much for the slider code. I do like it a lot. Most importantly each time i use it i save 20 minutes from writing code + most most most importantly each time i use processing i save lots and lots of hours
  
« Last Edit: Apr 30th, 2003, 3:48pm by Dara »  
benelek

35160983516098 WWW Email
Re: Similarity
« Reply #4 on: May 2nd, 2003, 3:32pm »

on Apr 29th, 2003, 9:59pm, REAS wrote:
i think it's very ironic that the totally uninteresting part of the code (scrollbar) is about as long as the interesting part of the code (asset)

 
why not merge/mutate the form of a scroller into the functioning forms of the assets
 
Dara

WWW Email
Re: Similarity
« Reply #5 on: May 4th, 2003, 11:18pm »

i didn't understand your question. could you explain it to me please.
 
Pages: 1 

« Previous topic | Next topic »