Howdy, Stranger!
We are about to switch to a new forum software. Until then we have removed the registration on this forum.
Categories
- All Categories 25.7K
- Announcements & Guidelines 13
- Common Questions 30
- Using Processing 22.1K
- Programming Questions 12.2K
- Questions about Code 6.4K
- How To... 4.2K
- Hello Processing 72
- GLSL / Shaders 292
- Library Questions 4K
- Hardware, Integration & Other Languages 2.7K
- Kinect 668
- Arduino 1K
- Raspberry PI 188
- Questions about Modes 2K
- Android Mode 1.3K
- JavaScript Mode 413
- Python Mode 205
- Questions about Tools 100
- Espanol 5
- Developing Processing 548
- Create & Announce Libraries 211
- Create & Announce Modes 19
- Create & Announce Tools 29
- Summer of Code 2018 93
- Rails Girls Summer of Code 2017 3
- Summer of Code 2017 49
- Summer of Code 2016 4
- Summer of Code 2015 40
- Summer of Code 2014 22
- p5.js 1.6K
- p5.js Programming Questions 947
- p5.js Library Questions 315
- p5.js Development Questions 31
- General 1.4K
- Events & Opportunities 288
- General Discussion 365
boxwrap2d VS Pbox2d
Hi folks, Im getting start with processing, and I'm experimenting with physics engines... I have some examples with boxwrap2d, and I have just download another example which is working with pbox2d library. Both libraries are under my processing(2.0.3)->modes->java->libraries. The problem is that now, when I run any sketch using any of them(never both at same time), I'm getting a error message "more than one library is competing for this sketch, -boxwrap2d (part of processing) -pbox2d (part of processing)
I don't understand why I can't have these different libraries under the same processing library folder.
Thanks in advance for the suggestions!
Answers
They both probably contain a JBox2D jar, but unfortunately also probably a different version. Processing can't cope with two versions of the same library (jar). If they supported the same version it might be possible to create a standalone JBox2D library, then you could remove the jar from both the libraries and it might work (you would have of course need to include your standalone library in your sketches).
Yes! this is the reason monkstone. I will rename temporally the boxwrap2d library to work meanwhile with pbox2d, because I think that is documented better than boxwrap.
Thanks again!