Howdy, Stranger!
We are about to switch to a new forum software. Until then we have removed the registration on this forum.
Categories
- All Categories 25.7K
- Announcements & Guidelines 13
- Common Questions 30
- Using Processing 22.1K
- Programming Questions 12.2K
- Questions about Code 6.4K
- How To... 4.2K
- Hello Processing 72
- GLSL / Shaders 292
- Library Questions 4K
- Hardware, Integration & Other Languages 2.7K
- Kinect 668
- Arduino 1K
- Raspberry PI 188
- Questions about Modes 2K
- Android Mode 1.3K
- JavaScript Mode 413
- Python Mode 205
- Questions about Tools 100
- Espanol 5
- Developing Processing 548
- Create & Announce Libraries 211
- Create & Announce Modes 19
- Create & Announce Tools 29
- Summer of Code 2018 93
- Rails Girls Summer of Code 2017 3
- Summer of Code 2017 49
- Summer of Code 2016 4
- Summer of Code 2015 40
- Summer of Code 2014 22
- p5.js 1.6K
- p5.js Programming Questions 947
- p5.js Library Questions 315
- p5.js Development Questions 31
- General 1.4K
- Events & Opportunities 288
- General Discussion 365
Answers
Dunno how much they differ. However, PVector got exactly 3
floatfields -> x, y, z.If you are not prepared to do the research yourself, I doubt that you are ready to use toxicilibs so you can safely ignore it.
They are similar, both Vec3D and PVector are 3D vectors (got x, y and z fields). Vec3D is toxiclib's standard vector implementation, PVector is Processing's standard vector implementation. Both classes offer functions for all basic vector math operations.
Processing and every 3D library have it's own implementation of a 3D point/vertex/vector. See this discussion on GitHub: https://github.com/processing/processing/issues/1779. Your question is a bit strange though, because you can just look at the reference for both and see what they are (capable of).