Howdy, Stranger!
We are about to switch to a new forum software. Until then we have removed the registration on this forum.
Categories
- All Categories 25.7K
- Announcements & Guidelines 13
- Common Questions 30
- Using Processing 22.1K
- Programming Questions 12.2K
- Questions about Code 6.4K
- How To... 4.2K
- Hello Processing 72
- GLSL / Shaders 292
- Library Questions 4K
- Hardware, Integration & Other Languages 2.7K
- Kinect 668
- Arduino 1K
- Raspberry PI 188
- Questions about Modes 2K
- Android Mode 1.3K
- JavaScript Mode 413
- Python Mode 205
- Questions about Tools 100
- Espanol 5
- Developing Processing 548
- Create & Announce Libraries 211
- Create & Announce Modes 19
- Create & Announce Tools 29
- Summer of Code 2018 93
- Rails Girls Summer of Code 2017 3
- Summer of Code 2017 49
- Summer of Code 2016 4
- Summer of Code 2015 40
- Summer of Code 2014 22
- p5.js 1.6K
- p5.js Programming Questions 947
- p5.js Library Questions 315
- p5.js Development Questions 31
- General 1.4K
- Events & Opportunities 288
- General Discussion 365
Which consumer depth cameras will work in processing instead of Kinect?
I just bought a Microsoft surface in the hope of using the 3d camera built in, but unfortunately it appears that it is not an easy solution, even as a non-3d camera (as opposed to using a webcam on a mac)
Has anyone used a camera like the Logitech Brio UHD in Processing as a 3d camera source? It's half the price of the XTion from ASUS (still pricy, but more modern than the original kinects I have)
I would prefer to use the surface built in system, but they seem problematic.
https://forum.processing.org/two/discussion/14403/camera-video-image-slow/p1 https://forum.processing.org/two/discussion/24985/how-to-access-the-surface-pro-4-cameras-corectelly/p1 (this question still has no responses)