Howdy, Stranger!
We are about to switch to a new forum software. Until then we have removed the registration on this forum.
Categories
- All Categories 25.7K
- Announcements & Guidelines 13
- Common Questions 30
- Using Processing 22.1K
- Programming Questions 12.2K
- Questions about Code 6.4K
- How To... 4.2K
- Hello Processing 72
- GLSL / Shaders 292
- Library Questions 4K
- Hardware, Integration & Other Languages 2.7K
- Kinect 668
- Arduino 1K
- Raspberry PI 188
- Questions about Modes 2K
- Android Mode 1.3K
- JavaScript Mode 413
- Python Mode 205
- Questions about Tools 100
- Espanol 5
- Developing Processing 548
- Create & Announce Libraries 211
- Create & Announce Modes 19
- Create & Announce Tools 29
- Summer of Code 2018 93
- Rails Girls Summer of Code 2017 3
- Summer of Code 2017 49
- Summer of Code 2016 4
- Summer of Code 2015 40
- Summer of Code 2014 22
- p5.js 1.6K
- p5.js Programming Questions 947
- p5.js Library Questions 315
- p5.js Development Questions 31
- General 1.4K
- Events & Opportunities 288
- General Discussion 365
In this Discussion
- gregorsart September 2017
Make a p5 sketch / canvas not scale when resizing the browser window (contain)
Hello there,
I am new to this forum. I am a Graphic Designer (and programming noob).
I tried to implement a p5.js sketch into uikit (A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces) so that in the end, my sketch is displayed within the browser window.
But, when I resize my Browser Window to simulate a tablet or a mobile device, the sketch (canvas) scales with the window. Is there a option to avoid this ... like "contain" in responsive behaviour?
I want (in my example) that there are less moving circles visible when I rescale the browser window. I do not want, that the cicles get smaller when I rescale the browser window.
You can find my emample on www.ga-analytics.de
Ty for your help,
newbie
Answers
I solved the issue with the help of the following post: https://forum.processing.org/two/discussion/comment/83079/#Comment_83079