Howdy, Stranger!
We are about to switch to a new forum software. Until then we have removed the registration on this forum.
Categories
- All Categories 25.7K
- Announcements & Guidelines 13
- Common Questions 30
- Using Processing 22.1K
- Programming Questions 12.2K
- Questions about Code 6.4K
- How To... 4.2K
- Hello Processing 72
- GLSL / Shaders 292
- Library Questions 4K
- Hardware, Integration & Other Languages 2.7K
- Kinect 668
- Arduino 1K
- Raspberry PI 188
- Questions about Modes 2K
- Android Mode 1.3K
- JavaScript Mode 413
- Python Mode 205
- Questions about Tools 100
- Espanol 5
- Developing Processing 548
- Create & Announce Libraries 211
- Create & Announce Modes 19
- Create & Announce Tools 29
- Summer of Code 2018 93
- Rails Girls Summer of Code 2017 3
- Summer of Code 2017 49
- Summer of Code 2016 4
- Summer of Code 2015 40
- Summer of Code 2014 22
- p5.js 1.6K
- p5.js Programming Questions 947
- p5.js Library Questions 315
- p5.js Development Questions 31
- General 1.4K
- Events & Opportunities 288
- General Discussion 365
In this Discussion
- GoToLoop March 2016
Noise() Function on Webpages
I put a game of mine on the Internet using Processing.js, and the noise() function seems not to work like it does when it is run with the Processing IDE. Here is an image of it in the Processing IDE (when noise() works). It causes the asteroid (in the lower left-hand corner) to appear very lumpy:
This is what it looks like online (on bleubox.altervista.org/defender.html):
It is not as obvious in the previous image, but the asteroids appear much more circular on average.
Tagged:
Answers
That's unfortunately true. noise()'s generated values don't match between Java & JS Modes.
For example, this online generated map sketch can barely generate any "mountains" while running under Pjs: http://studio.ProcessingTogether.com/sp/pad/export/ro.9Ql2E8JBC54LJ