Howdy, Stranger!
We are about to switch to a new forum software. Until then we have removed the registration on this forum.
Categories
- All Categories 25.7K
- Announcements & Guidelines 13
- Common Questions 30
- Using Processing 22.1K
- Programming Questions 12.2K
- Questions about Code 6.4K
- How To... 4.2K
- Hello Processing 72
- GLSL / Shaders 292
- Library Questions 4K
- Hardware, Integration & Other Languages 2.7K
- Kinect 668
- Arduino 1K
- Raspberry PI 188
- Questions about Modes 2K
- Android Mode 1.3K
- JavaScript Mode 413
- Python Mode 205
- Questions about Tools 100
- Espanol 5
- Developing Processing 548
- Create & Announce Libraries 211
- Create & Announce Modes 19
- Create & Announce Tools 29
- Summer of Code 2018 93
- Rails Girls Summer of Code 2017 3
- Summer of Code 2017 49
- Summer of Code 2016 4
- Summer of Code 2015 40
- Summer of Code 2014 22
- p5.js 1.6K
- p5.js Programming Questions 947
- p5.js Library Questions 315
- p5.js Development Questions 31
- General 1.4K
- Events & Opportunities 288
- General Discussion 365
In this Discussion
- Loadus October 2015
Another Library Template
Hello fellow Processing Library creators.
I just published a Library template that I use for my projects. In my opinion it is much simpler than the standard one, but it does not publish libraries with a website and this kind of stuff for now.
It is on github, and you can compile and build libraries to distribute just with two commands ! Cool heh ? So not to worry about setting the IDE, or learning Eclipse, If you want to build pure Java parts for your sketch it is an easy process.
It relies on shell script to create the archive and Maven to compile.
Cheers, Jeremy.
Comments
Just tried this and I must say, pretty handy. I can develop straight from Sublime with this.
Some strange little things happen compared to the Eclipse project version - javadoc throws an error about @example tag (warning - @example is an unknown tag) and doesn't include them in the doc + the vars in the code like "##library.prettyVersion##" are left as is, whereas in the Eclipse version they're modified to their respected values.
Note that I'm not that familiar with Maven, Ant nor Java so there is a big chance that I'm doing something wrong or omitted something. :D
Good job, anyways, this is very good.