 |
Author |
Topic: clock (Read 1748 times) |
|
scrap-pile
|
Re: clock
« Reply #1 on: Aug 8th, 2003, 6:04pm » |
|
very nice! 
|
|
|
|
|
Koenie
  
|
Re: clock
« Reply #2 on: Aug 8th, 2003, 9:31pm » |
|
That's a pretty cool clock! Digital and analog in one piece and completing each other. Welcome to paradox.
Koenie
|
http://koeniedesign.com
|
|
|
mannytan
|
Re: clock
« Reply #3 on: Aug 9th, 2003, 12:53am » |
|
the interesting thing is that it becomes more unreadable the more 'balanced' you make it.
|
|
|
|
|
benelek
|
Re: clock
« Reply #4 on: Aug 9th, 2003, 4:55am » |
|
makes sense, i guess. you can't understand analog methods if you're trying to interpret them as digital, and vise versa.
|
|
|
|
|
flight404
|
Re: clock
« Reply #5 on: Aug 9th, 2003, 7:58am » |
|
Really well conceived, Manny. Nicely done.
On a related note, would it be easy to throw up a sweeping second hand version? I know it would muck up the digital read out, but I think it would be nice to see the second counter rotate slowly as opposed to ticking.
Beautiful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
