Howdy, Stranger!
We are about to switch to a new forum software. Until then we have removed the registration on this forum.
Categories
- All Categories 25.7K
- Announcements & Guidelines 13
- Common Questions 30
- Using Processing 22.1K
- Programming Questions 12.2K
- Questions about Code 6.4K
- How To... 4.2K
- Hello Processing 72
- GLSL / Shaders 292
- Library Questions 4K
- Hardware, Integration & Other Languages 2.7K
- Kinect 668
- Arduino 1K
- Raspberry PI 188
- Questions about Modes 2K
- Android Mode 1.3K
- JavaScript Mode 413
- Python Mode 205
- Questions about Tools 100
- Espanol 5
- Developing Processing 548
- Create & Announce Libraries 211
- Create & Announce Modes 19
- Create & Announce Tools 29
- Summer of Code 2018 93
- Rails Girls Summer of Code 2017 3
- Summer of Code 2017 49
- Summer of Code 2016 4
- Summer of Code 2015 40
- Summer of Code 2014 22
- p5.js 1.6K
- p5.js Programming Questions 947
- p5.js Library Questions 315
- p5.js Development Questions 31
- General 1.4K
- Events & Opportunities 288
- General Discussion 365
Translating code from Mathematica to Processing?
Is there an easy way to translate Mathematica code to Processing code? Apart form learning Mathematica, of course ;)
Answers
To my knowledge, no.
Since Mathematica is backed with MILLIONS of lines of algorithmic code, it depends on what you are trying to do. Generally, the answer is certainly no. However, you might learn how to use the JLink libraries provided by Wolfram Inc to call the mathematica kernel from Processing and translate the result into something useful in your sketch. That is possible, in theory, though I haven't tried myself yet. According to the documentation for JLink you can go the other way as well, and call some Java code (like processing) from Mathematica. Depending on your intent, this might be what you want to do.