Howdy, Stranger!
We are about to switch to a new forum software. Until then we have removed the registration on this forum.
Categories
- All Categories 25.7K
- Announcements & Guidelines 13
- Common Questions 30
- Using Processing 22.1K
- Programming Questions 12.2K
- Questions about Code 6.4K
- How To... 4.2K
- Hello Processing 72
- GLSL / Shaders 292
- Library Questions 4K
- Hardware, Integration & Other Languages 2.7K
- Kinect 668
- Arduino 1K
- Raspberry PI 188
- Questions about Modes 2K
- Android Mode 1.3K
- JavaScript Mode 413
- Python Mode 205
- Questions about Tools 100
- Espanol 5
- Developing Processing 548
- Create & Announce Libraries 211
- Create & Announce Modes 19
- Create & Announce Tools 29
- Summer of Code 2018 93
- Rails Girls Summer of Code 2017 3
- Summer of Code 2017 49
- Summer of Code 2016 4
- Summer of Code 2015 40
- Summer of Code 2014 22
- p5.js 1.6K
- p5.js Programming Questions 947
- p5.js Library Questions 315
- p5.js Development Questions 31
- General 1.4K
- Events & Opportunities 288
- General Discussion 365
In this Discussion
- GoToLoop March 2018
What is better load image 18.7 KB or make it manually with p5.js functions like 'ellipse,rect...etc'
I can load image or make it manually with p5 functionality, so what is better for performance ? This is my code with manually created image :
Answers
Never actually tested such case. But my bet goes to 1 image over drawings. :-??
In case you've got drawings only, but want the supposed benefit of an image, you can createGraphics(), draw your stuff there.
Once your drawings are finished there, optionally if you prefer, you can invoke its method get() in order to clone it as a p5.Image.
Either way, you can now use image() in order to display your drawings over & over. :-bd
And w/ some luck, it's gonna pay off, and you'll get a better performance. \m/