We closed this forum 18 June 2010. It has served us well since 2005 as the ALPHA forum did before it from 2002 to 2005. New discussions are ongoing at the new URL http://forum.processing.org. You'll need to sign up and get a new user account. We're sorry about that inconvenience, but we think it's better in the long run. The content on this forum will remain online.

Index › Suggestions & Bugs › Website,  Documentation,  Book Bugs › Contract() should be Concat()

ggizmos YaBB Newbies Offline Posts: 1	Contract() should be Concat() Dec 1st, 2009, 4:36pm   On page documenting expand() I believe the reference at the bottom should be concat() not contract().

Cedric God Member Offline Posts: 1838	Re: Contract() should be Concat() Reply #1 - Dec 2nd, 2009, 12:59am   why do you think so? contract makes sense, as it is the opposite of expand, although it is not used anymore as mentioned in the corresponding page http://processing.org/reference/contract_.html
	twitter.com/CedricKiefer

PhiLho  YaBB Moderator Offline Posts: 4190 Near Paris (France)	Re: Contract() should be Concat() Reply #2 - Dec 2nd, 2009, 1:41am   Well you are right that this page should be updated, but the link to contract() should be replaced by one to subset().