Hi, I wondered if when working with video for example, you can work with the pixels[] function using it in this way:

pixels[x,y]= .....

instead of using it in the normal way:

pixels[x] = .....

I feel much more comfortable for certain things working in a 2 dimensional array instead of a 1 dimensional one. I mean, it's like more intuitive when u need to work comparing pixels that are near to each other and such things.

Thanx in advance

Ok, thanx, I feared I would have to do it that way xD I dont like it but if it's the only way... Ill have to do it like that ^^. Thanx!!!

I know, I know it works fine, it's just about working in a more "intuitive way" maybe it is cause Im used to Matlab / C++... who knows ^^ but nvm This way it's fine too.

That's not necessarily the answer...  That gets the corresponding x,y coordinates from the display:

Get a section of the display window by specifying an additional width and height parameter.

Note that get doesn't allow you to specify an image to get colour values from.  So what if the pixels you want are in a loaded image but not in the display (e.g. when the image is used as a heightmap for a 3d terrain)?  Also note:

Getting the color of a single pixel with get(x, y) is easy, but not as fast as grabbing the data directly from pixels[]. The equivalent statement to "get(x, y)" using pixels[] is "pixels[y*width+x]".

Oops!

Yes - but the documentation is a little hidden...  I still don't see the problem with the img.pixels[x + width * y] method of addressing though; the x and y are still clearly separate and identifiable and if it's quicker then so much the better...  Though it is of course important to remain in the bounds of the pixels array!