We closed this forum 18 June 2010. It has served us well since 2005 as the ALPHA forum did before it from 2002 to 2005. New discussions are ongoing at the new URL http://forum.processing.org. You'll need to sign up and get a new user account. We're sorry about that inconvenience, but we think it's better in the long run. The content on this forum will remain online.
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
What about JMF ? (Read 727 times)
KaL
What about JMF ?
Jan 21st, 2006, 5:48pm  
I'm currently working on an interactive video installation as a project for my school.
I'm doing color tracking while grabbing frames from the Processing Video library. It's damn slow ! I think it's caused by the VDIG.
I've read the posts about JMF and Meir's package (and I know it would be faster !). It doesn't want to compile : in fact, it makes jikes to crash. (I'm using processing 102)
Is anybody able to help me ?
Do you know a faster way to grab camera frames in Processing ?

Thanks.
Back to top
 
 
FloHimself
Re: What about JMF ?
Reply #1 - Jan 21st, 2006, 6:03pm  
Hi,

i haven't tried Meir's package, but maybe you may have a look into this (JMFLivePixelSource):
http://itp.nyu.edu/~dbo3/cgi-bin/ClassWiki.cgi?NetEX_VXP

Flo
Back to top
 
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›