We closed this forum 18 June 2010. It has served us well since 2005 as the ALPHA forum did before it from 2002 to 2005. New discussions are ongoing at the new URL http://forum.processing.org. You'll need to sign up and get a new user account. We're sorry about that inconvenience, but we think it's better in the long run. The content on this forum will remain online.
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
bug 97 (Read 523 times)
James
bug 97
Oct 17th, 2005, 6:16pm  
Hi all,

I've come up against this known bug
http://dev.processing.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=97
the suggested solution is to avoid points coinciding but as the geometry in my sketch is user generated I am not sure this can be reasonably achieved. Any idea when the bug may be addressed or suggestions of strategies to work around it - I really need to use either P3D or OPENGL for their superior speed compared with P2D. I would be happy to have a go at adding the required code to core.PGraphics3.triangulate_polygon myself but I'm not sure my java skills are up to the task just yet.

thanks
Back to top
 
 
James
Re: bug 97
Reply #1 - Oct 18th, 2005, 3:06pm  
will this bug be covered in the next processing update and if so any news on a *rough* timescale for that - ie are we talking a matter of weeks or months?

alternatively can anyone give me some pointers on how to takle this myself either by editing the processing core code or plugging the latest opengl gluTesselator and glu library into the current processing version??
Back to top
 
 
fry
Re: bug 97
Reply #2 - Oct 20th, 2005, 10:49pm  
derno, i can't commit to any sort of release schedule because it's all done in my spare time.

though in general, if you respond to the bug itself rather than re-posting to the board about it, you'll get better response...
Back to top
 
WWW  
fry
Re: bug 97
Reply #3 - Oct 30th, 2005, 1:31am  
closing thread, please follow-up at bug #97 rather than here.
Back to top
 
WWW  
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›