We closed this forum 18 June 2010. It has served us well since 2005 as the ALPHA forum did before it from 2002 to 2005. New discussions are ongoing at the new URL http://forum.processing.org. You'll need to sign up and get a new user account. We're sorry about that inconvenience, but we think it's better in the long run. The content on this forum will remain online.
Index › Discussion › General Discussion,  Status › Simon Greenwold's Particles -- Status
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Simon Greenwold's Particles -- Status? (Read 1690 times)
Alterscape
Simon Greenwold's Particles -- Status?
Sep 12th, 2005, 6:09pm  
Hey all,
 I'm just writing to check the status of Simon Greenwold's particle implementation for Processing. That library is written up just about everywhere, including the reference on the official site, but I can't seem to find a download link.  I appologize if this is a stupid question I should know the answer to.. x.x

Cheers,
Ryan Spicer
Back to top
 
 
REAS
Re: Simon Greenwold's Particles -- Status?
Reply #1 - Sep 12th, 2005, 9:06pm  
You should write to Simon directly. I don't want to post his email address in the forum, but it's easy to find through Google.
Back to top
 
WWW  
simong
Re: Simon Greenwold's Particles -- Status?
Reply #2 - Nov 6th, 2005, 3:55pm  
That's a fine question. And it deserves a response. The enemy of good is better, and Particles has been getting better. The most popular forces are springs, and I've upgraded the integrator to do a much more numerically stable and faster calculation for them (implicit integration). But it has this horrible kicking problem that I don't like and I have been shy to release it with. There is an obvious answer, which is to let the user pick which integration method to use. It's not hard. Hell. I'll do it right now. OK. Particles today (or tomorrow).
Back to top
 
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›