We closed this forum 18 June 2010. It has served us well since 2005 as the ALPHA forum did before it from 2002 to 2005. New discussions are ongoing at the new URL http://forum.processing.org. You'll need to sign up and get a new user account. We're sorry about that inconvenience, but we think it's better in the long run. The content on this forum will remain online.
Index › Discussion › General Discussion,  Status › Complexification source update (Beta 0087 syntax)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Complexification source update (Beta 0087 syntax) (Read 1797 times)
jtarbell
Complexification source update (Beta 0087 syntax)
May 6th, 2005, 9:48pm  
I'm happy to say I have updated all Processing algorithms at www.complexification.net to work properly (more or less) in Beta 0087.


 ::: www.complexification.net/gallery/

 ::: Source code is found with 'Launch Applet' links
     (a new window will appear with applet and link to the source).



Modified
There are some slight visual differences from the old 0067 versions.  Mainly, the replacement of my fat outdated transparent pixel (int based) method with a genuine alpha stroke and point (float based) introduced some new aliasing characteristics.  One algorithm (Sand.Stroke) simply could not be converted because it took advantge of a 0067 rendering anomaly.

Broken
On one machine here in the studio the applets are behaving weirdly (completely blank or halting execution just a few seconds in).  I'm still trying to determine the cause.  If you're seeing the same strangeness, I would be interested in hearing about it.


peace,
jared
Back to top
 
WWW  
fry
Re: Complexification source update (Beta 0087 synt
Reply #1 - May 6th, 2005, 11:38pm  
wow, what an effort! nice work..

i'd also be curious to hear about how things went with the porting, since you were fairly familiar with the old version.. like whether things went better with the new release, what sort of things were worse, whether the image quality is improved or if you're wistful for the old renderer, etc. i think the beta has several steps forward but there are a couple steps backward and i'm curious how it affected these pieces in particular. or maybe we should start a new thread rather than turning your announcement into a technical discussion..
Back to top
 
WWW  
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›