 |
Author |
Topic: case ....old command or missing reference? (Read 350 times) |
|
mKoser
 
|
case ....old command or missing reference?
« on: Sep 25th, 2003, 3:20am » |
|
i seem to remember using a command called case()
wanting to use it again, i found that P5 color-coded is as a P5-command, but there is no reference?
is this a web-site bug or a color-coding within P5 bug?
(btw. using 0062)
+ mikkel
|
mikkel crone koser | www.beyondthree.com | http://processing.beyondthree.com
|
|
|
mKoser
|
Re: case ....old command or missing reference?
« Reply #2 on: Sep 26th, 2003, 5:04pm » |
|
that's exactly what i meant (sorry, my background is Lingo ... in there it's called case.)
anyway,
either the coloring should be removed, or a reference-page should be created! 
|
mikkel crone koser | www.beyondthree.com | http://processing.beyondthree.com
|
|
|
REAS
|
Re: case ....old command or missing reference?
« Reply #3 on: Sep 26th, 2003, 5:39pm » |
|
you confused me with those ()...
the strategy is to only make reference pages for what we're calling the 'basic' reference. the 'advanced' reference will be done in a more 'traditional' reference format, such as javadocs.
+ casey
|
|
|
|
|
REAS
|
Re: case ....old command or missing reference?
« Reply #5 on: Sep 30th, 2003, 10:49pm » |
|
nothing to be sorry about. we need to get the advanced reference underway. there's alot of power in processing that the basic reference does not reveal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
