Howdy, Stranger!
We are about to switch to a new forum software. Until then we have removed the registration on this forum.
Categories
- All Categories 25.7K
- Announcements & Guidelines 13
- Common Questions 30
- Using Processing 22.1K
- Programming Questions 12.2K
- Questions about Code 6.4K
- How To... 4.2K
- Hello Processing 72
- GLSL / Shaders 292
- Library Questions 4K
- Hardware, Integration & Other Languages 2.7K
- Kinect 668
- Arduino 1K
- Raspberry PI 188
- Questions about Modes 2K
- Android Mode 1.3K
- JavaScript Mode 413
- Python Mode 205
- Questions about Tools 100
- Espanol 5
- Developing Processing 548
- Create & Announce Libraries 211
- Create & Announce Modes 19
- Create & Announce Tools 29
- Summer of Code 2018 93
- Rails Girls Summer of Code 2017 3
- Summer of Code 2017 49
- Summer of Code 2016 4
- Summer of Code 2015 40
- Summer of Code 2014 22
- p5.js 1.6K
- p5.js Programming Questions 947
- p5.js Library Questions 315
- p5.js Development Questions 31
- General 1.4K
- Events & Opportunities 288
- General Discussion 365
Is it possible to find the mouseX and mouseY with relation to the current matrix?
From what I can tell, mouseX and mouseY always are set off of the default matrix, with the origin at the top left. I am rotating and translating the grid, is there any way to make the mouse locations be related to that?
Tagged:
Answers
in 3D or 2D?
not sure what you mean but maybe look at screenX and screenY or even modelX and modelY iirc
2D, screenX might be what I'm looking for. I am moving the origin around, and rotating the matrix. The mouseX and mouseY locations are based off of the original starting matrix, so it is hard to find where they are in relation to my current rotated matrix.
Another way to say this: is there any way to find the actual location of an object in 2D, not based on the rotated/translated matrix, but based off of the original one?
screenX