Processing's Stack-based Model vs. ANAR
in
Contributed Library Questions
•
3 years ago
Hi,
I've been looking at ANAR, and it seems a much more logical way of approaching geometry than the native Processing model. It looks like ANAR replaces much of Processing, itself, which makes me wary of using it. How would I use other libraries, etc?
Likewise, the Peasy camera takes a similar approach to ANAR, and my life seems much easier.
Why does Processing uses the stack-based model? (I'm sure there must be some advantage to it.) I've written some code using it, but I feel like I'm a procedural programmer working in LISP.
What are people's experience using ANAR?
Cheers,
Bill
I've been looking at ANAR, and it seems a much more logical way of approaching geometry than the native Processing model. It looks like ANAR replaces much of Processing, itself, which makes me wary of using it. How would I use other libraries, etc?
Likewise, the Peasy camera takes a similar approach to ANAR, and my life seems much easier.
Why does Processing uses the stack-based model? (I'm sure there must be some advantage to it.) I've written some code using it, but I feel like I'm a procedural programmer working in LISP.
What are people's experience using ANAR?
Cheers,
Bill
1